Where do you stand on free trade? - free exchange anti spam
Should we allow this? We should be banned? How should we reform?
Is it reasonable to have to remember that more ships than American jobs to Mexico?
But in contrast, have the lowest prices at Walmart.
Training and employment is not like the distribution of jobs abroad are true ....... Only a few factory jobs dirty. Who wants to do the dirty work.
Therefore they tend to favor free trade.
But I do not understand how so many Democrats say are anti-ship jobs overseas, but still support free trade.
Your opinion?
PS Do you think this vid is cute?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hssbCtoW ...
It's just one of those special moments between two people legally married and he is so adorable.
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Free Exchange Anti Spam Where Do You Stand On Free Trade?
11 comments:
The "free trade" and outsourcing is a bad combination for the American worker.
Free trade is a utopia, like socialism. This works in theory but never in reality.
If America brought back its capitalist roots, and get the public road, then we might as successful as "Hong Kong experience," anything goes "policy of free trade has.
But it will not.
Free trade does not exist. Globalism has created a series of trade agreements has a very structured and non-democratic tendency to international banks and the promotion of multi-national companies. This system is responsible for the global credit crisis and destroy the American middle class. If this trend continues, socialism is inevitable in order to calm the masses and prevent a revolution extremists wither right or left.
Free trade does not exist. Globalism has created a series of trade agreements has a very structured and non-democratic tendency to international banks and the promotion of multi-national companies. This system is responsible for the global credit crisis and destroy the American middle class. If this trend continues, socialism is inevitable in order to calm the masses and prevent a revolution extremists wither right or left.
Free trade is a utopia. It is not the poor countries at our level, it offers the rich countries to their level. Think what you want, not far enough but not in the middle. It is now time for the fair!
Free trade .... NO ....
The fair ... YES.
In any case, the American people are forced to compete for jobs with the Communist countries, making $ 33 per hour. No way ... like.
NAFTA would be better if ...... worked
The closure of local businesses in the United States for a force of cheap labor in a foreign country must pay for workers in this country recently, half a percentage point of the current minimum wage paid at the closing. The scale should be rejected, the number of workers identified in the U.S..
In other words, has been installed, depending on size, determine the amount of "new" work is going to pay for their employees. This would have positive effects, have 2 1 - The number of the plant's closure would be the same, but over a long period of time. Training (for a successful transition to new jobs: the departure of U.S. employment) 2 -, avoiding the bad labor laws in foreign governments through the establishment of wage scales practiced before the move. It's a win-win for both parties
NAFTA would be better if ...... worked
The closure of local businesses in the United States for a force of cheap labor in a foreign country must pay for workers in this country recently, half a percentage point of the current minimum wage paid at the closing. The scale should be rejected, the number of workers identified in the U.S..
In other words, has been installed, depending on size, determine the amount of "new" work is going to pay for their employees. This would have positive effects, have 2 1 - The number of the plant's closure would be the same, but over a long period of time. Training (for a successful transition to new jobs: the departure of U.S. employment) 2 -, avoiding the bad labor laws in foreign governments through the establishment of wage scales practiced before the move. It's a win-win for both parties
NAFTA would be better if ...... worked
The closure of local businesses in the United States for a force of cheap labor in a foreign country must pay for workers in this country recently, half a percentage point of the current minimum wage paid at the closing. The scale should be rejected, the number of workers identified in the U.S..
In other words, has been installed, depending on size, determine the amount of "new" work is going to pay for their employees. This would have positive effects, have 2 1 - The number of the plant's closure would be the same, but over a long period of time. Training (for a successful transition to new jobs: the departure of U.S. employment) 2 -, avoiding the bad labor laws in foreign governments through the establishment of wage scales practiced before the move. It's a win-win for both parties
I support you closer to free trade as a brand (really free is unlikely).
I support this position because every other position on track interfere with my belief in personal freedom and right to my own happiness - if they do not infringe the rights of others. No person or group has the right, me or anyone else that can not voluntarily enter into an agreement with my performance to any other party to say - if this party is a nationally and internationally.
As a nation we need for our citizens, and productive work in which to fight - because the productivity of a prosperous country. The jobs we lose in those countries has been lost in which cheap labor market for various reasons, but a common thread - jobs that are easily moved, are also easily automated. If the work does not go to "Mexico" (etc.) would have probably been replaced by a machine or other advanced technology to reduce costs.
Limit to act in order "Jobs ", because society as a whole worse. The only problem is that the pain of those who have lost their jobs will see a lot more than the cost savings and productivity gains that for the whole of society. To Any person who does not think the that things are quite rationally could conclude that trade is bad - and yet it is would be a mistake.
It's easy. If our government supports, it is very probably wrong.
So the best thing you've seen the name of Congress for their support?
The theory of justice - stifles freedom of expression
Employee Free Choice Act - allows clubs to trade union members, to intimidate the vote against a union.
These projects are so called because the corrupt politicians do not know most of the people, what really should be a law, but if the name is good to be doing well.
What do the dirty work, we need to find a job in another perspective.
Jobs that a product or a service to local resources (staff, wood, clay, which can always be sold too) outside the community as a thriving community. A wool factory, shoes, poultry or dairy products, or exploitation, the manufacture of cars and all schools to a product that people want. It also creates jobs for less skilled people from outside the community.
Works that do not "produce" what the people or should, or do not use only local resources to move away from the community. Wal-Mart hiringLocal people and pay taxes, but they have more money from the community in wages and taxes. Wal-Mart, car dealerships, grocery stores, and sell the things you want, but here from the community. Works like these are parasitic. They feed on the wealth of a community.
Works, the general, as trade unions, social organizations and government vehicles only community. They are also a parasite, which is an indicator that is finally eating into the community if the community is very strong.
Now. Let's say you and 999 other people on a deserted island. To get what kind of job. They need food and shelter, they do not want government services, you do not want union jobs that do not want a supermarket, farmers and hunters, manufacturers and individuals to purchase water. All the dirty jobs ...
Finally, you will need, and begin to look for luxury. Then he goes to the overproduction and build and sell boats to their products on the continent and those things. But the luxury --ur coming to producing something of value.
If all the producers of Dirty Jobs disappear, eventually the money runs out.
If the government (see above) to regulate "on" trade, if the government "business" taxes if the trade unions that wages and benefits "to" high, can not it is in competition with the world. You have to go, where you can compete. Their dirty work is gone. Will create something of value, you are bankrupt.
Post a Comment